Search

Where do keyword volume numbers actually come from?

Every SEO tool shows a monthly search volume and a difficulty score. What is behind those, why they disagree with each other, and what ours says about itself.

How MarketWar handles it

Without a live data source our keyword numbers are labelled PLACEHOLDERS rather than estimates, in the product, because they are derived from a hash of the keyword and have no relationship to how that term behaves — so the term the screen calls easiest may be the hardest on the list. A 0 to 100 difficulty figure is never presented as meaningful ordering while it is synthesised, because an estimate uncorrelated with the thing it estimates is not an estimate, and naming it accurately is the difference between a scaffold and a lie.

Open any SEO tool and you will see that a keyword gets 2,400 searches a month and has a difficulty of 38 out of 100.

Both numbers feel like measurements. Neither is one, in any tool, and the reason is worth understanding before you plan a year of content on them.

Nobody has the real number

Search engines do not publish per-keyword search volume to third parties. Every tool therefore models it — from clickstream panels, from sampled advertising data, from its own crawling — and the models disagree with each other, often by multiples, on the same term.

Difficulty is worse, because it is not even modelling an observable quantity. It is a vendor's own composite of link and authority signals, which is why a term rated 30 by one tool is rated 60 by another. There is no external truth to check either against.

None of that makes them worthless. It makes them relative within one tool — useful for ordering two terms against each other in the same product, and misleading the moment you treat them as counts and build a forecast on them.

What ours says about itself

With no data source connected, the keyword numbers here are labelled placeholders, in the interface, not estimates.

That word was chosen deliberately and it replaced a softer one. The earlier wording called them relative proxies, which implies the ordering means something. It does not: these figures are derived from a hash of the keyword string, so the term the screen calls easiest may genuinely be the hardest on the list.

An estimate that is uncorrelated with the thing it estimates is not an estimate. It is a number of the right shape in the right place, and the only honest name for it is placeholder.

Why ship a placeholder at all

So the interface is complete and testable before a data source is wired in — the screens, the exports and the tests all exist and work, and connecting a provider changes the numbers without changing anything around them.

The alternative, which is what most products do, is to ship the same scaffolding with the word "estimate" on it. The customer then plans against figures with no information in them, and nobody ever finds out, because an SEO forecast that does not come true has a hundred available explanations.

The data you already have, which is real

Search Console shows the queries your site actually appears for, with real impressions, real clicks and real positions. It is a much smaller picture of your market and it is entirely true.

For a local business that is usually sufficient: the terms you already rank for on page two are the cheapest wins available, and they are visible for free.

The order of operations that works

Specific pages about things you actually do, each saying something only you can say. Then look at what people were already searching for when they found you, and write more of that.

That sequence needs no volume estimate at all, which is convenient, because nobody has one.

The question to ask any SEO vendor

Where does this number come from, and what happens to it if your panel changes?

A vendor who answers plainly is worth listening to about the rest. A vendor who presents a modelled figure as a measurement has told you how they treat every other number on the screen.

What this does not do

Until a data source is connected, these numbers tell you nothing about your market. That is the whole point of the label — the interface is complete and testable, and it does not pretend the figures are findings.

Common questions

Why do two SEO tools give different volumes for the same keyword?

Because neither has the real number. Search engines do not publish per-keyword volume to third parties, so every tool models it from clickstream panels and its own sampling, and the models disagree.

So the numbers are useless?

Not useless, but they are relative at best — useful for ranking one term against another within a single tool, and not for planning on absolutes. Treating them as counts is the common mistake.

Why does yours say placeholder?

Because without a connected source it is a hash of the keyword string, which carries no information about the keyword. Calling that an estimate would imply the ordering means something, and it does not.

What should I use instead?

Your own data. Search Console shows the queries you actually appear for, with real impressions and clicks — a smaller and entirely true picture of your market.

Related

All the answers · Free website audit · What it costs